" /> Primordial Ooze: January 2007 Archives

« December 2006 | Main | February 2007 »

January 26, 2007

Best Buy and defective product sales

I was in Best Buy this weekend. This was the second trip on a $100 gift card that was burning a whole in my pocket. My generous friend treated me to the gift card for Christmas after I helped him with his website earlier in the year.

With me I brought my youngest son Marco. Marco wanted to get some kind of bear movie since he was obsessed with bears lately. I figure I would look into getting some old sci-fi movies, hopefully at a discount price.

After finding “Brother Bear 2”, I came across a widescreen copy of Steven Speilberg’s 2005 War of the Worlds for $9.99. That didn’t seem right but at that price I simply didn’t think. I also picked up a 2–pack of The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms and Them, two classics from the “atomic age” for another $9.99.

Back to War of the Worlds.

When I got home, I later popped in the Worlds disc and noticed that it didn’t play. I popped out the disc and saw some huge surface defects on the bottom of the disc! Holy cow, no wonder the disc was so cheap. How annoying! There was no indication on the disc, other than the price, that this was a defective product.

My first instinct would be to march back to Best Buy and complain, perhaps demand a “real” disc but that would have been such a hassle. A hassle that I’m sure the Best Buy folks are betting on. How infuriating!

In the end, I have a DVD/CD Repair unit from Aleratec which I used to scrub off a few layers of plastic to fully restore the disc. After 4–5 treatments, the disc worked like “new”. The scratches were totally gone and the disc played perfectly.

Now the $50 repair unit effectively gets cheaper with every disc I repair. In this case, I saved $10 for repairing the defective Worlds DVD. I guess I can start looking for these faulty discount discs as a strategy to save money in the future.

But still, this is a totally offensive tactic and I’m left just shaking my head.

 

 

January 24, 2007

The Value of Beer

I got this in an e-mail and I normally would pay it no heed, but, we all need to make exceptions. Look, I even have a blog category for this one. I make no claim that these people actually said these things. But this is about beer so it really doesn’t matter.

"Sometimes when I reflect back on all the wine I drink I feel shame . Then I look into the glass and think about the workers in the vineyards and all of their hopes and dreams. If I didn't drink this wine, they might be out of work and their dreams would be shattered.

Then I say to myself, "It is better that I drink this wine and let their dreams come true than be selfish and worry about my liver."

~ Jack Handy


"I feel sorry for people who don't drink. When they wake up in the morning, that's as good as they're going to feel all day. "

~Frank Sinatra


"When I read about the evils of drinking, I gave up reading."

~ Henny Youngman


"24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not."

~ Stephen Wright


"When we drink, we get drunk. When we get drunk, we fall asleep. When we fall asleep, we commit no sin. When we commit no sin, we go to heaven. So, let's all get drunk and go to heaven!"

~ Brian O'Rourke


"Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy."

~ Benjamin Franklin


"Without question, the greatest invention in the history of mankind is beer. Oh, I grant you that the wheel was also a fine invention, but the wheel does not go nearly as well with pizza."

~ Dave Barry


“To some it's a six-pack, to me it's a Support Group. Salvation in a can!”

~ Dave Howell


And the best one yet:

And saving the best for last, as explained by Cliff Clavin, of Cheers. One afternoon at Cheers, Cliff Clavin was explaining the "Buffalo Theory" to his buddy Norm.

Here's how it went:

"Well ya see, Norm, it's like this... A herd of buffalo can only move as fast as the slowest buffalo. And when the herd is hunted, it is the slowest and weakest ones at the back that are killed first. This natural selection is good for the herd as a whole, because the general speed and health of the whole group keeps improving by the regular killing of the weakest members. In much the same way, the human brain can only operate as fast as the slowest brain cells. Excessive intake of alcohol, as we know, kills brain cells. But naturally, it attacks the slowest and weakest brain cells first. In this way, regular consumption of beer eliminates the weaker brain cells, making the brain a faster and more efficient machine. That's why you always feel smarter after a few beers."


 

Zing Blog

My good friend John has started blogging. His introduction states it best:

By way of introduction, let me just mention that I am a software developer and designer, and also a musician and origami artist. The idea behind this blog is all about the creative process, and resulting works. I want to provide an entry point to pages that change elsewhere on my site, for example when I post something new, such as songs I’ve made or origami models, or interactive software, art work or whatever. Also I want to comment on the creative process of my work as it evolves, and hopefully get some interesting discussions going on. On top of that I will probably be some of the usual bloggish commentary on random things that I see on the street, or in the media, or that are a part of my life and times.

You can find his main site here. His origami is pretty amazing (actually, everything is amazing). Here are some teasers:

Subscribed!

January 23, 2007

Steve Jobs Introduces the iPhone (Mad TV)

Thanks Pavan (via Tech Blog)

January 21, 2007

WinZIP and StuffIt Expander compatibilities

I recently became a fan of some of the new compression algorithms that WinZIP is supporting. The one that is working best for me is PPMd. I was able to get about 40% compression on my camera RAW files, about 100GB and reduce that to about 60GB.  This was a huge savings and allowed me to avoid a hard drive upgrade possibly for six more months.

I wanted to send a large PDF to friends and I know some of them use a Mac, so I was curious to see if StuffIt expander supported this compression algorithm. As it turns out, 10.x does not, but 11.02 does.

It’s funny, I’ve been seeing a reminder lately on my MacBook asking me to upgrade to 11.02 and I kept hitting, no, no, no. Then, when I tried to unpack my ZIP file that uses PPMd compression and saw how 10.x failed, I immedately upgraded and was pleasantly surprised to see the zip file unpack successfully.

 

January 19, 2007

Sick multi-touch demonstration!

Multitouch1

In this video, Jeff Han and Phil Davidson demonstrate how a multi-touch driven computer screen will change the way we work and play.

(link)

January 10, 2007

Plutoed... it's a word

Not only a word, but the 2006 Word of the Year by the American Dialect Society.

To pluto is to demote or devalue someone or something, as happened to the former planet Pluto when the General Assembly of the International Astronomical Union decided Pluto no longer met its definition of a planet.

Some of the other words are also pretty funny. Looks like the ADS has a sense of humor.

Most Useful—climate canary: an organism or species whose poor health or declining numbers hint at a larger environmental catastrophe on the horizon.

Most Creative—lactard: a person who is lactose-intolerant… actually this is kind of mean.

Most Unnecessary—SuriKat: the supposed nickname of the baby girl of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes.

Most Outrageous—Cambodian accessory: Angelina Jolie’s adopted child who is Cambodian.

     …and the runner up in this category (which had to be mentioned) was firecrotch: a person with red pubic hair.

Most Euphemistic—waterboarding: an interrogation technique in which the subject is immobilized and doused with water to simulate drowning; reported to be used by U.S. interrogators against terrorism detainees.

Most Likely to Succeed— YouTube: as a verb, to use the YouTube web site or to have a video of one’s self be posted on the site.

Least Likely to Succeed— grup: a Gen-Xer who does not act his or her age.

Check it (via haha.nu)

January 9, 2007

Workflow problems with iPhoto

I was at my Grandmother's house last week and I noticed a photo album on her coffee table. It looked a lot like this (with similar pictures of snowboarders):

iPhoto Album

Mac users will recognize this as an iPhoto “Book”. I definitely liked the dense picture-rich layout of the book. As I flipped through the book, I was more and more impressed. It wasn't until I got to the end of the album that I learned how it was made. Turning to the last page revealed the answer... “Made with a Mac” appeared prominently on inside back cover.

When I went home that night I fired up my MacBook and started playing with iPhoto and the photobooks in an effort to create my own master “2006: A Year in Photos” for my family.

Until now, I had been making photo albums online with services like snapfish and shutterfly. I think we've gotten good results with these services in the past, but I simply liked Grandma's book better.

The first step was to get my photos off my Windows machine and onto my Mac. My Windows machine is still my primary workplace for photo editing and management since I own Adobe Photoshop CS on that platform. When Creative Suite CS3 comes out later this year, I will switch to the Mac full-time. Until then, I had to get all of my 2006 photos onto my laptop.

To do that, I spent the better part of my first weekend on the project converting my camera RAW files to full-size JPEG files. I had 5 megapixel images already on my Windows machine since my camera spits those out in addition to the RAW files. However, I wanted the full 10.3 megapixel JPEG's available to make sure all of my images would have at least 300dpi of resolution at 8.5“ x 11” (the size of the book I wanted to create). My camera spits out 3888 horizontal pixels so this yields 353dpi at 11“ which is more than sufficient to yield crisp, clear photos. Well, so long as my photos are crisp and clear to begin with!

This conversion yielded about 4300 photos. I then brought them into iPhoto and was faced with finding a strategy to rate them. The approach I used was going to be multi-pass. On the first pass, I rated any photo I thought had a chance of making the iPhoto book with 3 stars (of 5). I did this by pressing the Apple+3 key combo. This yes/no approach took hours to complete and I found that the train was a great place to do it. Thank Apple for providing the Apple+3 combo, a feature that Picasa on the PC lacks unless I'm mistaken.

iPhoto has a feature called ”Autoflow“ which makes it relatively easy to cram all of your photos into the book with a single click. However, as I found out, the process stops abruptly when you exceed 100 pages. This alert and my subsequent struggles are essentially the reason for this post.

Tagging photos as 3 stars still yielded over 500 photos and this was too many to cram into a photo book by simply pressing Autoflow. Autoflow was just not smart enough. To avoid a fist-fight with the ”iPhoto Book's are limited to 100 pages“ alert, I decided to continue the rating process so I could get the final image count down.

To do this, I created a smart album which only contained images with a rating of 3 stars or more. This approach allowed me to ”forget about“ photos I had discarded early. I then picked the better ones and rated them with 4 stars. I was liberal in rating images as 4 stars since I realized at this point that the album would likely only contain images with ratings of 4 and 5 stars.

My image count got down to about 300 photos. I then further refined my count by creating a 4-star smart album and marking the photos that I absolutely had to have in the book with 5 stars. My final smart album, 5 stars, 280 photos, hours of agonizing work.

Still, Autoflow complained. Arg!

To understand my problems with Autoflow, I need to explain how photos are laid out in iPhoto books. When you create a new page in an iPhoto book, it can have a wide range of layouts. Layouts can contain a single image, attractive layouts of 3-4 photos, or a big grid of 16 photos. When you choose Autoflow” it seems to choose a simple mix of 2, 3, and 4 photo layouts. Over the course of 100 pages, this yields an average capacity of about 300 photos.

It would be very simply for the Autoflow feature to realize you have more photos than will fit with this scheme and adjust the page layouts to compensate. At 16 photos per page, Autoflow could support over 1600 images per book! Of course, uploading 1600 photos would be a huge task and I fear it may break in the middle and I have no idea what might happen to the workflow if that were to happen.

In addition, iPhoto has no way to select a couple of 2-page layouts, move them to a layout that can support more photos and “pull” photos back from the rest of the book to back-autoflow the book to yield more empty pages at the back of the book to be auto-filled with the remaining photos.

Autoflow works sequentially, so when it stops at 10 pages the remaining images are at the end of your image pool.

Part of my problem is that I require the photos to appear in order. This was a “2006” book, after all. Other users might not care to have their photos in any particular order and iPhoto's ability to change the layout to a higher count and simply dump some of your “last photos” in the middle of your book won't be a problem.

I'm finishing this post on the train. I was so busy at work today I missed all of the MacWorld keynote goodness I was hoping to catch. I'm hoping when I get home and watch it online that Apple will reveal a new version of iLife, with a new version of iPhoto, with a new version of Autoflow.

January 4, 2007

Animation vs. Animator

This is a great animation. An animator’s creation wreaks havok on his desktop. This is a really a treat.